Hi @MahaB82A
This guy works in his video with a normal rectangle. This rectangle has a pattern as fill colour that was (previously) saved as a colour field. The rectangle has also been renamed ‘Pattern’ in the layer panel.
In my video you can see how the rectangle ‘Pattern’ was created.
https://vimeo.com/1118566726?share=copy#t=0
... View more
There is really no reason to ‘dig up’ a 5 year old thread for this. Also, your post has nothing to do with the original question about a script.
As Monika has already suggested: Use one of the right tools, then everything will work as it should. Try it.
... View more
Wie groß ist dein Bild in Pixeln? Kannst du uns bitte einen Screenshot zeigen - vom Menü: Bild -> Bildgröße (und Pixel eingestellt) z.B. ein häufiger Fehler ist, wenn beim Erstellen eines Bildes aus Versehen statt 2000 Pixel z.B. 2000 Zentimeter angegeben wurden. Das führt zu einem exorbitanten Anstieg der Dateigröße.
... View more
I would probably convert the file to greyscale in Photoshop. Or, depending on your workflow, work media-neutral in RGB in your layout programme and convert to CMYK when outputting the print file with Device Link Profile.
... View more
Depending on how your scans look - do you have already tried the integrated function Menu: File -> Automate -> Crop and straighten photos?
... View more
@jane-e is absolutely right. Technically speaking, all the colour patches visible in your screenshot show the same colour value. The ‘perceived deviations’ are therefore more likely to be an optical illusion.
... View more
Double-click your gradient. Because in my opinion you are using a black 100% opacity to black 0% opacity gradient. That gives exactly this result.
... View more
Maybe it's just a translation problem. Maybe I just misunderstood your question.
If your question is: Which of the two images is more suitable (instead of correct), then I would favour image 1 for a skater (background blurred). For a person running, your last image shown is a common variant.
... View more
From a physical point of view - yes. That is also wrong. Nevertheless, this is one of the most common ways to digitally display a motion blur effect. And because we have seen it so often by now and are therefore ‘used to it’, it seems right to us.
... View more
The blur effect is incorrectly applied in the second image. It is physically impossible for a single moving object to move at different speeds. Therefore it is also impossible to clearly recognise parts of the face etc.
... View more
Maybe a better way (instead of pulling your hair out): Show what you want to cut, upload a sample file to a hoster of your choice and post the link.
There is a very good chance that you will be helped.
... View more
You can change this behaviour in two places. - Either globally in the Preferences. - Or in the Transform Panel. (What Kurt Gold already said) Tick Scale Stroke and Effects
... View more
Do you already know which colours you want to eliminate (this is probably the most difficult part)? After all, your image should only contain black and white elements.
... View more
Then save this merged layer in the file format of your choice. The 100% view is binding. However, the view in other zoom levels will always differ from this.
... View more
There are three selection tools and each ‘is in a corner’. Please show a fullscreen screenshot.
Bounding box must be switched on. Otherwise transforming will not work. Can be found in the menu: View
Glad it is solved.
... View more